Foundations
The Foundation Hall
What does the Law of Persons ask, and what are its building blocks?
What it asks
Three questions: WHO is a legal subject? WHEN does personality begin and end? HOW do personal attributes affect capacity? SA is a mixed system — Roman-Dutch common law, modified by legislation, transformed by the Constitution.
Subjects & Objects
A legal subject bears rights and duties — natural persons (humans) and juristic persons (companies, the State). A legal object is a thing over which rights are held; it holds no rights of its own.
Four Classes of Rights
- Real rights — over corporeal things (ownership)
- Personal rights (claims) — performance owed by another
- Personality rights — life, body, dignity, fama, privacy
- Immaterial property — copyright, patents, trademarks
The Capacities
- Legal (passive) capacity — hold rights; every person from live birth
- Capacity to act — perform valid juristic acts (create, alter, end legal relationships)
- Capacity to litigate — sue or be sued in one's own name
- Accountability — responsibility in delict and criminal law
Status
Status = the bundle of capacities. Modifying factors: age, mental condition, marriage, insolvency, prodigality, intoxication, disability, domicile.
Sources of Obligations
- Contract — liability voluntarily assumed; remedies: specific performance, cancellation, damages
- Delict — a civil wrong requiring conduct, wrongfulness, fault, causation and damage; actions: actio legis Aquiliae (patrimonial loss), actio iniuriarum (personality), action for pain and suffering
- Unjustified enrichment — a shift of value without legal cause (sine causa) which must be reversed
Succession in a nutshell
Testate succession follows a valid will; intestate succession (Intestate Succession Act) applies where there is no valid will. A beneficiary must generally have personality at the relevant time — the key exception being the nasciturus fiction. Succession is the bridge between the beginning and the end of personality.
Key Rule
Law of Persons asks WHO is a subject, WHEN personality begins/ends, and HOW attributes affect capacity. Four capacities: passive · to act · to litigate · accountability.
Common Mistake
Saying 'a minor has no capacity'. A minor has full passive capacity (they hold rights); what they lack is full capacity to act.
Live birth
The Gate of Birth
When does legal personality begin?
Live + Complete birth
Personality begins at birth if
(1) the birth is complete — full separation from the mother — and
(2) the child lives after separation, even briefly. Signs: Separation · Lived · Breathed. No viability or minimum survival required; the cord need not be cut.
Registration records, not creates
The Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992 requires registration within 30 days — but registration records personality; it does not create it. Whether a child was born alive is a question of fact (the hydrostatic test post-mortem).
The foetus & termination
A foetus is not a legal subject and has no enforceable right to life against the mother. The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996 permits lawful termination (Christian Lawyers' Association).
Naming & parentage
A birth is registered under a surname and given name(s) (changeable later under the Act). Maternity is usually self-evident from the birth; paternity may be shown by a presumption (the pater est presumption for a married mother), admission, or DNA evidence, which a court may order under the Children's Act 38 of 2005.
Key Rule
Personality begins at LIVE + COMPLETE birth — Separation + Lived + Breathed. Registration records but does not create.
Leading Cases
Christian Lawyers Association of SA v Minister of Health1998 (4) SA 1113 (T)A foetus is not a legal person and has no s 11 right to life — 'everyone' in the Bill of Rights does not include the unborn.
Facts. The Christian Lawyers Association challenged the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996, arguing that the s 11 right to life in the Constitution protects the foetus from the moment of conception.
Legal question. Is a foetus a bearer of the right to life in s 11 of the Constitution — that is, a legal person?
Judgment. The court rejected the challenge and upheld the Choice Act — the foetus is not a legal persona.
Significance. The leading authority that the unborn child has no personality or right to life — which is why the nasciturus fiction, not personhood, is the only route by which the unborn benefits.
Exam tip. Use for the beginning-of-personality rule and the limits of the nasciturus fiction: no live birth, no personality.
Common Mistake
Saying the umbilical cord 'must be cut'. It need not be — only physical separation plus living after separation are required.
The unborn
The Nasciturus Nook
How can an unborn child benefit before it is a legal person?
What it is
The nasciturus fiction protects the interests of an unborn but already-conceived child by treating it, in law, as if it had already been born — but only where that is to the child's benefit, and only once it is in fact born alive.
The maxim
Nasciturus pro iam nato habetur quotiens de commodo eius agitur — the unborn is treated as already born whenever it is to its advantage.
The three requirements (memorise)
- CONCEIVED — the child must already have been conceived at the relevant time (e.g. when the will took effect, or when the harm occurred)
- BORN ALIVE — the child must later be born alive (alive, even momentarily, after complete separation from the mother)
- ADVANTAGE — the fiction is applied only where it benefits the child, never to its disadvantage
How it works
While the child is unborn the benefit is held in suspense; on live birth it vests retrospectively, as though the child had been a legal person all along. If the child is stillborn, the fiction never operates and the benefit falls away.
Where it applies — succession
Its classic home is succession, in both forms. Intestate: the division of the estate is postponed until the child is born; if born alive it inherits as if it had been alive at the death (Ex parte Boedel Steenkamp). Testate: s 2D(1)(c) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 presumes that a bequest to a testator's 'children' (or a class) includes those already conceived at the death who are later born alive — unless the will shows a contrary intention.
Where it applies — delict
The fiction was historically extended to delict for prenatal injuries (Pinchin v Santam), but RAF v Mtati held the fiction is not needed in delict — ordinary delictual principles suffice once the child is born alive. The fiction is therefore now mainly a succession tool. It is not used to award prenatal maintenance.
Its limits
The fiction does NOT give the foetus legal personality — an unborn child is not a legal subject and has no s 11 (Constitution) right to life (Christian Lawyers Association). It simply suspends a benefit until live birth, and can never be used to the child's disadvantage.
Key Rule
Nasciturus = conceived + born alive + to its advantage. It does not confer personality; it suspends a benefit that vests retrospectively on live birth.
Common Mistake
Saying the fiction gives the unborn child rights or personality. It does neither — it is a protective device that operates only once the child is born alive, and only in the child's favour.
Key Cases on the Nasciturus Fiction
Ex parte Boedel Steenkamp1962 (3) SA 954 (O)The foundational SA application — an unborn child may inherit in succession if later born alive.
Facts. A testator's will left a benefit to grandchildren; the question was whether a grandchild conceived but not yet born at the relevant time could share.
Legal question. Can a conceived-but-unborn child take a benefit in succession?
Judgment. The court applied the fiction in the child's favour in the succession context.
Significance. The locus classicus for the nasciturus fiction in the law of succession. A bequest to "living children" includes a child conceived but not yet born at the testator's death, provided the child is later born alive.
Exam tip. Use for the succession limb of the nasciturus fiction; remember the three requirements: (1) child conceived, (2) will benefit, (3) born alive.
Pinchin v Santam Insurance1963 (2) SA 254 (W)Extended the fiction to delict in principle, allowing a claim for prenatal injuries once the child is born alive.
Facts. A child was born with disabilities allegedly caused by an injury to the mother (and thus the foetus) before birth; a delictual claim was brought.
Legal question. Can the nasciturus fiction extend to a delictual claim for pre-natal injury?
Judgment. The court accepted the fiction could apply in delict in principle.
Significance. Extended the nasciturus reasoning beyond succession into delict — though RAF v Mtati later showed ordinary delictual principles make the fiction unnecessary in this context.
Exam tip. Pair with RAF v Mtati, which later showed the fiction is not actually needed in delict.
Road Accident Fund v Mtati2005 (6) SA 215 (SCA)The fiction is not needed in delict — ordinary delictual principles suffice once the child is born alive; confines the fiction largely to succession.
Facts. A child suffered brain damage from a pre-birth motor accident and later claimed from the Road Accident Fund.
Legal question. Is the nasciturus fiction necessary to found a delictual claim for pre-natal injury?
Judgment. The SCA upheld the claim on ordinary principles without relying on the fiction, confining the nasciturus fiction largely to succession.
Significance. Departed from Pinchin and confined the nasciturus fiction to succession; delict stands on ordinary principles.
Exam tip. After Mtati, don't reach for the fiction in delict — use ordinary principles and rely on the child being born alive.
Christian Lawyers Association of SA v Minister of Health1998 (4) SA 1113 (T)A foetus is not a legal person and has no right to life under s 11 of the Constitution — confirming the fiction does not confer personality on the unborn.
Facts. The Christian Lawyers Association challenged the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996, arguing that the s 11 right to life in the Constitution protects the foetus from the moment of conception.
Legal question. Is a foetus a bearer of the right to life in s 11 of the Constitution — that is, a legal person?
Judgment. The court rejected the challenge and upheld the Choice Act — the foetus is not a legal persona.
Significance. The leading authority that the unborn child has no personality or right to life — which is why the nasciturus fiction, not personhood, is the only route by which the unborn benefits.
Exam tip. Use for the beginning-of-personality rule and the limits of the nasciturus fiction: no live birth, no personality.
Juristic persons
The Tower of Juristic Persons
How do non-human entities acquire legal personality?
Incorporation
Juristic persons (companies, close corporations, universities, the State) acquire personality by a legal act of incorporation or statute — e.g. a company on registration under the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Once incorporated, it is a subject with its own rights, duties and estate, separate from its members.
Animals & the environment
Animals remain legal objects, not subjects — but they are protected by animal-welfare legislation and the environmental right (s 24 of the Constitution). The law imposes duties on humans regarding their treatment.
Key Rule
Natural persons are born; juristic persons are incorporated. Animals are legal objects, not subjects.